Vijay Sehrawat v. State Of Haryana

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-24360-2022 Date of Decision:-11.10.2022 VIJAY SEHRAWAT ... Petitioner(s)

Versus

STATE OF HARYANA ... Respondent(s) -.-

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KARAMJIT SINGH -.- Present:- Mr. Amardeep Singh Sheoran, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Naveen Kumar Sheoran, DAG, Haryana.

-.- KARAMJIT SINGH , J. (Oral) Prayer is for grant of anticipatory bail in case having FIR No.105 dated 23.02.2022 registered under Section 61 of Excise Act, at Police Station Sadar Tauru, District Nuh.

The counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner who was not named in the FIR has joined investigation with the police by virtue of previous order dated 31.05.2022 passed by this Court. PUNEET CHAWLA 2022.10.12 10:42 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment

( 2 ) CRM-M-24360-2022 The State counsel on instructions from HC Ashok Kumar has not controverted the aforesaid submissions made by counsel for the petitioner and further submitted that recovery of car has already been effected from the petitioner and the petitioner who has associated with the investigation is not required by police for further investigation or for custodial interrogation.

Admittedly, the recoveries have already been effected in this case and the petitioner is not required by the police for any further investigation as he has already joined investigation with the police by virtue of order dated 31.5.2022.

In view of the above, without commenting on the merits of the case, the present petition is hereby allowed and order dated 31.5.2022 is hereby made absolute. The petitioner should abide by the conditions envisaged under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.

( KARAMJIT SINGH) 11.10.2022 JUDGE Gaurav Sorot Whether reasoned / speaking?

Yes / No Whether reportable?

Yes / No PUNEET CHAWLA 2022.10.12 10:42 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment