Gurnam Singh v. State Of Punjab & ORS

CRM-M-44440-2015 -1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-44440-2015 Date of Decision: January 5, 2016 Gurnam Singh .....Petitioner

Versus

State of Punjab and others ......Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARESH KUMAR SANGHI 1.

Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ?

2.

To be referred to the Reporters or not ?

3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?

Present:

Mr.Vaibhav Sehgal, Advocate for the petitioner.

........

NARESH KUMAR SANGHI, J.(ORAL) Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he would be satisfied if respondent No.2, i.e. the Commissioner of Police, Ludhiana, is directed to decide the representation, Annexure P2, in a time bound manner.

After hearing the learned counsel for the applicant and going through the material available on record, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to the Commissioner of Police, Ludhiana, respondent No.2, to decide the representation, MEENU 2016.01.06 11:07 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document chandigarh

CRM-M-44440-2015 -2Annexure P2, within two months of receipt of certified copy of the present order in accordance with law.

January 5, 2016 (NARESH KUMAR SANGHI) meenu JUDGE MEENU 2016.01.06 11:07 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document chandigarh