Kuldip Singh v. State Of Punjab And Others

2024:PHHC:043318 [282]

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CWP-12207-2019 Date of Decision : 01.04.2024 Kuldip Singh

...Petitioner

versus State of Punjab and others ....Respondents Coram :

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY Present :

None for the petitioner.

Mr. Charan Preet Singh, AAG, Punjab.

*** AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL) [1] The prayer in the present Civil Writ Petition filed under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India, is for the issuance of a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to decide the representations of the petitioner dated 17.09.2013, 12.08.2016, 20.03.2017 & 25.06.2018 (Annexures P-6 to P-9).

[2] Learned counsel for the respondent-State referring to reply dated 18.08.2022 submits that the representation of the petitioner had been considered and retiral benefits i.e. gratuity and pension have been credited to his account.

[3] In view of the above, the substantive relief having already been granted, the present petition has become rendered infructuous. However, in case any grouse still survives, the petitioner may file a representation within four weeks, which shall be decided by the respondents expeditiously. [4] Disposed of as having been rendered infructuous. (AMAN CHAUDHARY) JUDGE 01.04.2024 'R. Sharma'

Whether speaking/ reasoned :

Yes/No Whether reportable :

Yes/No RAJNEESH SHARMA 2024.04.05 01:39 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document