Kuldeep Singh v. State Of Punjab
!"# $% &#'()($* +,, -.
,,,
01/
/
,,,/
2. , /
3333
,
.
! "
" # $ %$ & '
" &
" ( $) %$$*& '
+, -+. /0 $ $) %$$ %)*($#1 ((0(()+,12 !3 1 * /#'"($* /#*"#*'#
%)*4(()+, +(" ($#1 +, + &*" % !3 " 5"23 33 " 3$(3 . 671/, 1$* )3 !,26
"" +3 3 "& 6 "3"3 1&33" " & # ! &383 1 " +3
33 9"" -+ : ; 3 < "" %)*(()($#1 +, 3 " &3
&"3
"& ( 7
" //1&&" &%#& 7 "
" " & " = "
> " 3 &, $) $( %$ # 7 1 " &=
98 " & $ "%/& & & , ?
$% %$%#
+ 83 ?
(#< "3 " " "& (?$ (? , ,"3 "" 3'
2 >@ ", Som Dutt and others Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh (2022) 6 SCC 7228
'
2 ! 1 "6....having regard to the fact there are no criminal antecedents against the appellants, the court is inclined to give them the benefit of releasing them on probation of good conduct. In that view of the matter, while maintaining the conviction and sentence imposed on the appellants, it is directed that the appellants shall be released on probation of good conduct....." )
3 '
2 >@ " , Lakhvir Singh Vs. State of Punjab (2021) 2 SCC 7638
'
&
1 "6. We may notice that the Statement of Objects and Reasons of the said Act explains the rationale for the enactment and its amendments: to give the benefit of release of offenders on probation of good conduct instead of sentencing them to imprisonment. Thus, increasing emphasis on the reformation and rehabilitation of offenders as useful and self-reliant members of society without subjecting them to the deleterious effects of jail life is what is sought to be subserved."
+ 3 " ( $) %$$* & '
+, 3 " # $ %$ & '
3& 3" >3 " " * ,= & 3 " " Rs.%$$$$513 &8" 8 8 3& $ !" <:; + "& 3 ""
8 &" " " "
3
!4'5 +6 (i)
8 5 A5. :;
A5.