← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRWP/4472/2023dismissed

Jashanpreet Kaur v. State Of Punjab And Others

2023-05-29Mr. Justice Sanjay Vashisth2 pages

2023:PHHC:078249 CRWP-4472-2023 - 1 -

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-4472-2023 Decided on : 29.05.2023 Jashanpreet Kaur . . . Petitioner(s)

Versus

State of Punjab and others . . . Respondent(s) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY VASHISTH PRESENT: Mr. Sarun Gupta, Advocate for Mr. Sumeet Puri, Advocate for the petitioner(s).

Mr. Anmol Singh Sandhu, AAG, Punjab.

**** SANJAY VASHISTH , J. (Oral) 1.

On 09.05.2023, after hearing counsel for the petitioner, following order was passed:- "1.

By way of present protection petition, Jashanpreet Kaur, aged 24 years has submitted that respondent No.4 - Jagdev Singh is her husband but both of them are not in good relation for the last about one year.

2.

Counsel for the petitioner submits that photographs of petitioner and respondent No.4, though of being husband and wife, have been circulated by respondent No.4 on the social media through interest.

3.

Getting perturbed, petitioner moved a representation dated 01.03.2023 (Annexure P-1) sent through courier dated 02.03.2023, to respondent No.2 - I.G.P. Patiala Zone, but no action is being taken. Even respondent No.4 is pressurizing her to withdraw the said complaint by visiting her house in the late night along with some other persons.

4.

Notice of motion for 29.05.2023.

5.

On asking of Court, Mr. Anmol Singh Sandhu, AAG, Punjab, who is present in Court, accepts notice on behalf of JAWALA RAM 2023.05.30 17:48 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

2023:PHHC:078249 CRWP-4472-2023 - 2 - respondent No.1 to 3 (State).

Let requisite copies of complete paper-book be supplied to learned State counsel, during course of the day. 6.

Learned State counsel would get the said representation examined and then file status report before this Court on or before the next date of hearing." 2.

Today, counsel for the petitioner states that since petitioner and respondent No.4 are related as husband & wife, both of them have resolved their disputes amicably. Thus, he seeks withdrawal of present petition. 3.

Dismissed as withdrawn.

(SANJAY VASHISTH) JUDGE May 29, 2023 J.Ram Whether speaking/reasoned:

Yes/No Whether Reportable:

Yes/No JAWALA RAM 2023.05.30 17:48 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document