Sushil Malik v. State Of Haryana And ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

CRM-M-25349-2022 Date of Decision: 23.11.2022 Sushil Malik .... Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana and another .... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR VERMA Present: - Mr. Saransh Sabharwal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Gaurav Bansal, Assistant Advocate General, Haryana. ASHOK KUMAR VERMA, J. (ORAL) At the outset, learned counsel for the State submits that the instant petition has been rendered infructuous and may be disposed of, as such, because the main complaint has already been withdrawn by respondent No. 2-complainant.

In view of the above, the instant petition is disposed of as having been rendered infructuous.

November 23, 2022 (ASHOK KUMAR VERMA) rishu JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No RISHU KATARIA 2022.11.24 11:02 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment