Meena Dahiya v. State Of Haryana
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-45869-2018 Date of Decision:-25.11.2019 MEENA DAHIYA ... Petitioner
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA & ANOTHER ... Respondents
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GURVINDER SINGH GILL Present:- Mr. A.P.S. Shergill, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Ashok Singh Choudhary, Addl. A.G., Haryana. GURVINDER SINGH GILL, J. (Oral) Learned State counsel upon instructions from ASI Ram Rishipal has informed that upon investigation, the petitioner has been found to be innocent and is not required for any purpose. In view of the aforestated position, the petition is rendered infructuous and is dismissed.
However, in case, the petitioner is required to be arrested at any later stage, one week's prior written notice be served upon her. ( GURVINDER SINGH GILL) 25.11.2019 JUDGE Gaurav Sorot Whether reasoned / speaking?
Yes / No Whether reportable?
Yes / No GAURAV SOROT 2019.11.26 10:34 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document