Rajan Budhwar v. State Of Punjab And ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M No. 4793 of 2015 Date of Decision: 20.04.2015 Rajan Budhwar ......Petitioner

Versus

State of Punjab & another .....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJ MOHAN SINGH Present: Mr. Sushil Saini, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Varun Sharma, A.A.G., Punjab.

Mr. G.S. Kler, Advocate, for the complainant.

**** 1.

Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ?

2.

To be referred to the Reporters or not ?

3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? RAJ MOHAN SINGH, J (ORAL) Learned counsel for the petitioner states that in pursuance to order dated 13.02.2015, the petitioner has joined the investigation. However, learned State counsel on instructions from ASI Avtar Singh and duly assisted by Mr. G.S. Kler, Advocate, counsel for the complainant, states that the petitioner has not facilitated recovery of gold ornaments. Marriage was solemnized SACHIN SHARMA 2015.04.21 10:16 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh

CRM-M No. 4793 of 2015 between the parties in the year 2002. Two children took birth from this wedlock who are 11 years and 5 years of age and they are living with the petitioner.

Learned counsel for the complainant states that wife has already resorted to the filing of divorce petition as well as petition under Section 125 Cr.P.C. which are statedly pending before trial Court.

Looking to the entire facts and circumstances of the case, interim order dated 13.02.2015 is made absolute. Petition stands disposed of.

20.04.2015 [RAJ MOHAN SINGH] sachin JUDGE SACHIN SHARMA 2015.04.21 10:16 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh