Parveen v. State Of Haryana

In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh ......

Criminal Misc. No.M-4833 of 2015 .....

Date of decision:18.2.2015 Parveen

...Petitioner

v.

State of Haryana

...Respondent

....

Coram:

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Inderjit Singh .....

Present:

Mr. Karan Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Deepak Grewal, Deputy Advocate General, Haryana for the respondent-State.

.....

Inderjit Singh, J.

The petitioner has filed this petition under Section 439 Cr.P.C. for grant of regular bail in case FIR No.510 dated 12.12.2012 registered for the offences under Sections 398, 401, 332, 353, 307, 186 and 506 IPC and Section 25 of the Arms Act at Police Station Barwala, District Hisar. Notice of motion to Advocate General, Haryana. On the asking of the Court, Mr. Deepak Grewal, learned Deputy Advocate General, Haryana has put in appearance and accepted notice on behalf of the respondent-State and contested this petition. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as HARPAL SINGH PARMAR 2015.02.19 10:10 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh

Cr. Misc. No.M-4833 of 2015 [2] learned Deputy Advocate General, Haryana appearing for the respondentState and have gone through the record. From the record, I find that the petitioner is in custody since 12.12.2012. He is not required for interrogation or investigation purposes as he is in judicial custody.

As per the prosecution version, it is no injury case. The FIR has been registered on the basis of a secret information. As per the prosecution version, the present accused/petitioner along with others stopped the vehicle for the purpose of robbery and they were apprehended on the spot. Nothing is to be recovered from him. The trial of the case will take long time. No useful purpose will be served by keeping the petitioner in custody till the final disposal of the case. Keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the present case, without discussing the facts in minute detail and without going into the merits of the case, this criminal miscellaneous petition is allowed and the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail subject to his furnishing personal bond in the sum of `50,000/- with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court/Duty Magistrate. February 18, 2015.

(Inderjit Singh) Judge *hsp* HARPAL SINGH PARMAR 2015.02.19 10:10 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh