Mohd Sad v. State Of Haryana
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc. No. M-4879 of 2015 Date of decision: 24.12.2015 Mohd. Sad ..Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana ..Respondent
CORAM:
HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE DAYA CHAUDHARY
1. Whether reporters of local newspapers may be allowed to see judgment? Yes/No
2. To be referred to reporters or not? Yes/No
3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Yes/No
Present:
None for the petitioner.
Mr. Baljinder Singh Virk, DAG, Haryana for the respondent - State.
Daya Chaudhary, J. (Oral) Learned State counsel submits that in compliance of the order passed by this Court on 13.03.2015, the petitioner has joined investigation and is no more required.
In view of the submission made by learned State counsel, interim order dated 13.03.2015 passed by this Court is made absolute.
Disposed of accordingly.
24.12.2015 (DAYA CHAUDHARY) neetu JUDGE NEETU RANI 2015.12.26 15:48 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh