Ratti Khan v. State Of Haryana & ORS

CRM-M-4960-2014

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CRM-M-4960-2014 Date of Decision: October 16, 2015 Ratti Khan

...Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana and others

...Respondents

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARESH KUMAR SANGHI

Present:

Mr. Minkal Rawal, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Mr. Sanjay Kumar, AAG, Haryana, for the respondents.

1.

Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?

2.

To be referred to the Reporters or not?

3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?

NARESH KUMAR SANGHI, J (Oral) Learned counsel for the State after taking instructions from HC Jai Singh of Police Station, Tauru, District Mewat, submits that two policemen have been deputed at the house of the petitioner for his protection. He further submits that out of nine nominated accused, four have been arrested and remaining five have been declared as proclaimed offenders. The prosecution would file the charge-sheet (challan) at the earliest.

PRASHANT KAPOOR 2015.10.17 16:17 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document

CRM-M-4960-2014 In view of above, learned counsel for the petitioner does not press this petition at this stage.

Ordered accordingly.

(NARESH KUMAR SANGHI) JUDGE October 16, 2015 Pkapoor PRASHANT KAPOOR 2015.10.17 16:17 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document