High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCWP/11563/2020disposed of

Tilak Raj And ANR v. State Of Haryana And ORS

2020-08-13Mr. Justice Jitendra Chauhan2 pages

CWP-11563-2020 -1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-11563-2020 (O&M) Date of decision : 13.08.2020 Tilak Raj and another

...Petitioner(s)

Versus

State of Haryana and others

...Respondent(s)

CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA CHAUHAN

Present:

Mr. Nonish Kumar, Advocate for the petitioner(s). Ms. Shubhra Singh, Addl.A.G., Haryana.

JITENDRA CHAUHAN J. (ORAL) The matter has been taken up through video-conferencing in the light of the pandemic COVID-19 situation and as per instructions. This writ petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India has been filed for the issuance of a direction to the respondents to consider the application of the petitioners for grant of permits under the Stage Carriage Scheme of 2016.

Learned counsel for the petitioners states that at this stage he would be satisfied, if a direction is issued to respondent No.2-The Transport Commissioner, Haryana, 30 Bays Building, 2nd Floor, Sector 17B, Chandigarh, to consider and decide the representations dated 04.03.2020 (Annexures P-15 and P-16), expeditiously.

Heard.

Having regard to the prayer made and without adverting to the ATUL SETHI 2020.08.14 14:09 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document

CWP-11563-2020 -2merits of the case, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2-The Transport Commissioner, Haryana, 30 Bays Building, 2nd Floor, Sector 17B, Chandigarh, to consider and decide the representations dated 04.03.2020 (Annexures P-15 and P-16), expeditiously, preferably within six weeks from the receipt of the certified copy of the judgment. In case, on consideration, the competent authority reaches to the conclusion that the benefit claimed by the petitioners is admissible to them, in such eventuality, the consequential relief be allowed, within a period of six weeks thereafter, in accordance with law. However, in case the competent authority feels that the relief claimed by the petitioners is not admissible or made out, in that case, a speaking order(s) be passed in the matter.

13.08.2020 (JITENDRA CHAUHAN) atulsethi JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned :

Yes No Whether Reportable :

Yes No ATUL SETHI 2020.08.14 14:09 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document