Balwinder Singh And ANR v. State Of Ut, Chandigarh And ORS
In the High Court for the States of Punjab and Haryana At Chandigarh CRM-M-27928-2021 (O&M) Date of Decision:-8.2.2022 Balwinder Singh and another ... Petitioners
Versus
State of Union Territory of Chandigarh and others ... Respondents
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GURVINDER SINGH GILL Present:- Mr. Yashpal Thakur, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. A.K. Goyal, Addl.P.P., U.T., Chandigarh, assisted by ASI Raghbir Singh.
(proceedings conducted through video conferencing) ***** GURVINDER SINGH GILL, J.(Oral) CRM-3458-2022 In view of the reasons mentioned in the application, the same is allowed and the documents annexed with the application are taken on record as Annexure R-1 subject to all just exceptions. CRM-M-27928-2021 (Main Case) Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that in view of the statement Annexure R-1 of petitioner No.1 Balwinder Singh as placed on record today, wherein petitioner No.1 Balwinder Singh has himself stated that the occurrence had taken place in Patiala, he may be permitted to withdraw the instant petition.
PANKAJ KAKKAR 2022.02.08 14:01 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document
( 2 ) CRM-M-27928-2021 (O&M) Learned counsel representing State of U.T., Chandigarh, upon instructions from ASI Raghbir Singh, has informed that the case has already been sent to Patiala pursuant to the aforesaid statement of petitioner No.1 Balwinder Singh.
In view of the aforestated position and also the statement made by learned counsel for the petitioners, the instant petition is hereby dismissed as withdrawn.
8.2.2022 ( Gurvinder Singh Gill ) pankaj Judge Whether speaking /reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable Yes / No PANKAJ KAKKAR 2022.02.08 14:01 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document