Maya Ram v. State Of Haryana

CRM-M-25352-2022

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CRM-M-25352-2022 Date of decision:26.08.2022 Maya Ram ... Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana ... Respondent

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE VIKAS BAHL

Present:

Mr. Amandeep Kaur, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Munish Sharma, AAG, Haryana.

VIKAS BAHL, J. (ORAL) This is a first petition under Section 438 Cr.P.C. for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in FIR No.51 dated 21.01.2022 registered under Sections 406, 420 and 506 IPC at Police Station Naraingarh, District Ambala.

On 02.06.2022, a Coordinate Bench of this Court was pleased to pass the following order:- "Learned counsel contends that the alleged promise to provide job to the complainant was made by co-accused Vikram Singh @ Vicky and petitioner had only introduced the two, therefore, in these facts, his custodial interrogation may not be necessary.

Notice of motion for 26.08.2022.

Meanwhile, the petitioner shall join the investigation and would come present as and when called for and in the event of arrest, the petitioner shall be admitted to interim bail on his furnishing personal and surety bonds to the satisfaction of Arresting/Investigating Officer. The petitioner shall also abide by the conditions as specified under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.

June 02, 2022 (MANOJ BAJAJ ) JUDGE"

ISHWAR SINGH GARHWAL 2022.08.29 11:46 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document

CRM-M-25352-2022 Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that in pursuance of the said order, the petitioner has joined the investigation. Learned State counsel, on instructions from Inspector Narinder Singh, has submitted that the petitioner has joined investigation and is not required for further investigation.

Keeping in view the above said facts and circumstances moreso, the facts which have been noticed in the order dated 02.06.2022, and also the fact that the petitioner has joined the investigation and is not required for further investigation, the present petition is allowed and the interim order dated 02.06.2022 is made absolute. Nothing stated above shall be construed as an expression of opinion on the merits of the case and the trial would proceed independently of the observations made in the present case which are only for the purpose of adjudicating the present bail petition.

(VIKAS BAHL) JUDGE August 26, 2022 ishwar singh Whether speaking / reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No ISHWAR SINGH GARHWAL 2022.08.29 11:46 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document