Santosh Kumari v. State Of Haryana And Others

106 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.10861-2025 Date of Decision: 25.04.2025 Santosh Kumari ....Petitioner vs.

State of Haryana and others ....Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL

Present:

Mr. Mahabir Singh Tanwar, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Raman Sharma, Addl. A.G., Haryana Mr. Sanjiv Kaushik, Advocate Ms. Simran Sharma, Advocate and Ms. Manreet Kaur, Advocate for respondents No. 3 and 4 *** JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (ORAL) 1.

The petitioner through instant petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India is seeking setting aside of transfer order dated 17.03.2025 whereby she has been transferred from Ambala to Bhiwani.

2.

The petitioner claims that she was transferred last year and as per applicable policy, she could not be transferred at least within three years. She is 55 years old and has been transferred at a far off place. She has filed representation dated 18.03.2025 (Annexure P-7) with respondent seeking recalling of transfer order.

PARAMJIT KAUR SAINI 2025.04.25 02:58 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CWP No.10861-2025 -23.

Mr. Sanjeev Kaushik, Advocate assures the Court that competent authority shall consider representation of the petitioner and pass an appropriate order within seven days from today. 4.

In the wake of statement of Mr. Sanjeev Kaushik, Advocate, the petition stands disposed of .

Till adjudication of representation of the petitioner, status quo, as on today, shall be maintained.

(JAGMOHAN BANSAL) JUDGE 25.04.2025 paramjit Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes Whether reportable:

No PARAMJIT KAUR SAINI 2025.04.25 02:58 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document