Raj Kali v. State Of Haryana & ORS




    
       Date of decision: 3rd September, 2015  Raj Kali

Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana and others

Respondents        !
  !
 1.

Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment?

2.

Whether to be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?

Present:

None for the petitioner.

Mr. Munish Sharma, Asstt. Advocate General, Haryana for respondents No.1 to 4.

None for remaining respondents.

 !
"#  $ In spite of repeated pass1overs none has come present to assist the Court on behalf of the petitioner, which was the situation even on the last date of hearing and in spite of messages having been flashed, none has put in appearance, impels this Court to dismiss this petition for non1prosecution.

#  !
$   !%&'%()%*+" 
 RATTAN PAL SINGH 2015.09.04 17:04 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court