Jamshed v. State Of Haryana


203 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision: 14 th October, 2021 Jamshed ... Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana ... Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN Present :

Mr. Munfaid Khan, Advocate for the petitioner.

Ms. Harpreet Kaur, AAG, Haryana for the respondent-State. Mr. Mazlish Khan, Advocate for the complainant. *** AVNEESH JHINGAN , J.(Oral) 


              !     "    #$"% &'( )) *)   )+ ) 

*) +( + *)
, ! !"   ' % &-.

"
/ 01.2.,!

3.45
 "" &#6
""- " ) .6"  %

      -  
  1.  2.  .$77"

*
&+)())))8
$#--.#.5  9.!#.-:$# / $""% &- ;  "        $.    "   .

"-.")  .

" $""" .$77".#-" .""        -     .            +3"#*)  -""<  #-$.$#   .  #  . & +)())))8
   

.= #.-# ;    "  

    #        #$" $..#  "1:#-$# /   

 =:#  "$.
- ." "

    :        .         .$77"...5#" "   " "#$.
1.2. "" $#  
. --"    5         $.       ".--- $# .9.!# ;".

"

$" ""% &.$77". $"


.#"".# "". In Y.S. Jagan Mohan Reddy Versus CBI (2013) 7 SCC 439, the Supreme Court held as under:- "34. Economic offences constitute a class apart and need to be visited with a different approach in the matter of bail. The economic offences having deeprooted conspiracies and involving huge loss of public funds need to be viewed seriously and considered as grave offences affecting the economy of the country as a whole and thereby posing serious threat to the financial health of the country."

- .--".%& 9.!#$""".""   $: -""-$6# .#" $-  . "-

""  
  $ ." .$77"..' . #$" . <-"$"" $5  .





AVNEESH JHINGAN 


























 th October, 2021



  >8 6 08' > $" 08'