Shadi Ram And ANR. v. Mukhtiar Kaur

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH INCOMP-902-2024 (O&M) Date of decision: 21.11.2024 Shadi Ram and another ...Appellants

Versus

Mukhtiar Kaur

...Respondent

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS SURI

Present:

None.

***** VIKAS SURI, J. (Oral) 1.

The aforesaid appeal was filed on 26.11.2018 by Shri Jagmeet Singh Moudgill, Advocate. The Registry had raised objection on the case file. Thereafter, the case was refiled but met with the same fate. Lastly, objection was raised on 28.12.2021. 2.

As per Rule 9, Chapter 1, Part-A, Volume V, Punjab and Haryana High Court Rules and Orders, the petition on which objections have been raised by the Registry is to be taken back by the counsel/ party, who filed it, to be re-filed within a total period of 40 days. In spite of SMS having been sent at the registered mobile, the same was not taken back for re-filing after removal of objections. On failure, the case is to be listed before the Court for orders.

3.

A note was published by the Registry in the cause list of 18.09.2024 as well as on the website of the Court, whereby the SUMIT KUMAR 2024.11.22 18:48 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment

INCOMP-902-2024 -2advocates were requested to collect their cases lying with objections, which were filed upto 31.12.2023, for re-filing after removal of objections. It was further notified that all pending cases of such nature will be listed before Court for appropriate orders. 4.

Case has been listed in the urgent cause list for today. None has come present.

5.

Keeping in view the aforesaid factual matrix, no further order is required to be passed. The file be consigned to the record. 6.

Disposed of.

(VIKAS SURI) November 21, 2024 JUDGE sumit.k Whether speaking/reasoned :

Yes / No Whether Reportable :

Yes / No SUMIT KUMAR 2024.11.22 18:48 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment