Ramandeep v. State Of Haryana

-1CRM-M-22448-2020

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CRM-M-22448-2020 Date of Decision: 14.08.2020 Ramandeep ... Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana ... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARNARESH SINGH GILL

Present:

Mr. Harpreet Singh Dandiwal, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Mr. Pardeep Prakash Chahar, DAG, Haryana.

HARNARESH SINGH GILL, J.(Oral)





 
 



    

 

 

 


 bearing FIR No.283 dated 11.06.2020, registered at Police Station City Fatehabad, District Fatehabad, under Sections 147, 148, 149, 307, 323, 324, 427 and 506 IPC.

Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the petitioner has neither been named in the FIR nor any role has been attributed to him; that there was no intention on his part to cause any injury to the injured and that he has been indicted as an accused on the basis of disclosure statement of co-accused, Lakhanpal.

On the other hand, the learned State counsel while opposing the prayer made in the present petition, submits that injuries on the person of injured, Gurvinder and Satyawan, are on their vital parts. PARVEEN KUMAR 2020.08.14 04:03 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

-2CRM-M-22448-2020 I have heard the learned counsel for the parties. The petitioner has been indicted as an accused on the basis of disclosure statement of co-accused. The challan has been presented. The petitioner has been in custody since 17.06.2020. Trial of the case would take time to conclude. Therefore, no useful purpose would be served by keeping him behind the bars.





 
 
   
  

 


 









 

  
 

 










   
 
 
 


 


 

 



 14.08.2020








  


 















 
Note:

!
    
"







# $
!



"

# $ PARVEEN KUMAR 2020.08.14 04:03 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document