Rohit Tuli v. Harminder Singh And ORS

300 IN THE E HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB B AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR-2808-202 Date of Deci LI ision: 17.11.2025

...Petitioner

ROHIT TUL

Versus

ER SINGH AND ORS

...Respondents

HARMINDE CORAM: H HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKR RAM AGGARWAL Present:- None for the petitioner .

Mr. Harmanpreet Singh, Advoca Mr. Nitesh Singhi, Advocate for respondent No.1.

ate for None for respondents No.2 and AGGARWAL, J.(Oral) 3.

VIKRAM A 1.

As per the report of the Regis stry, notice could not be issued to resp pondent No.4, as correct address s was not furnished.

2.

No one has put in appearance o on behalf of the petitioner.

Even on the l last date of hearing, there was no o representation on behalf of the petitio ner. It appears that the petitioner r is no longer interested in pursuing the present petition.

3.

Dismissed for non-prosecution.

(V VIKRAM AGGARWAL) JUDGE 17.11.2025 himanshu Whether reasoned/speaking: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No HIMANSHU 2025.11.18 16:49 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document