Nitin v. State Of Haryana

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M No.24708 of 2022 Date of Decision: 26.08.2022 Nitin `

...Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana

...Respondent

CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA

Present:

Mr. Sumit Kumar, Advocate for Mr. Baljeet Beniwal, Advocate for the petitioner.

Ms. Ambika Sood, Addl. A.G., Haryana for the respondent-State.

* * * * MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA, J.

(ORAL) The petitioner herein has sought the relief of anticipatory/pre- -arrest bail in the criminal case arisen out of the FIR bearing No.438 dated 10.12.2021 registered at Police Station Chandhat, District Palwal, under Sections 148, 149, 323, 324, 427, 452 and 506 IPC. Today, learned State counsel, on the instructions from HC Pawan Kumar from the above-said Police Station, apprises the Court that in compliance of the order dated 01.06.2022 passed by the Co-ordinate Bench, the petitioner has joined in the investigation and his custodial interrogation is not required and he is also not involved in any other criminal case of the similar nature.

In view of the afore-discussed submission as made by learned State counsel, the instant petition is allowed and the relief of interim bail, NEETU RANI 2022.08.26 18:26 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgement PHHC, Chandigarh

CRM-M No.24708 of 2022 -2- .....

as extended to the petitioner named Nitin, by the Co-ordinate Bench vide the said order dated 01.06.2022, is hereby made absolute. However, the petitioner shall continue to join in the investigation as and when required/called upon to do so and shall also strictly abide by all the conditions as laid down in Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. (MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA) 26.08.2022 JUDGE neetu Whether speaking/reasoned Yes Whether Reportable No NEETU RANI 2022.08.26 18:26 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgement PHHC, Chandigarh