← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCWP/11622/2024disposed of

Sewak Singh Mann v. State Of Punjab And Others

2024-05-17Mr. Justice Rajesh Bhardwaj2 pages

CWP-11622-2024 -1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-11622-2024 Date of Decision: May 17, 2024 Sewak Singh Mann ......Petitioner

Versus

State of Punjab and others ......Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAJESH BHARDWAJ

Present:

Mr.Arihant Goyal, Advocate for the petitioner.

........

RAJESH BHARDWAJ, J.(ORAL) 1.

Petitioner has approached this Court praying for issuance of directions to respondents No.1 to 5 to get release the Government Pahi bearing passage NO.1141 from the illegal possession of respondents No.9 to 13 which has been forcibly included by respondents No.9 to 13 in their own land at the behest of respondents No.6 to 8 and due to which the petitioner is unable to approach his agricultural land which is lying barren which amounts to violation of Article 19(1)(g) as provided by the Constitution of India and further to direct respondents No.1 to 5 to reconstruct the Government Pahi bearing Passage No.1141 by fixing the pillars so that the petitioner may approach his agricultural land and may cultivate the same in order to earn his livelihood.

2.

It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner made number of requests to the respondents, however no action has been taken on his requests.

MEENU 2024.05.20 10:10 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CWP-11622-2024 -23.

Notice of motion to official respondents only at this stage. 4.

On asking of the Court, Mr.Navneet Singh, Sr.DAG, Punjab, who is present in Court, accepts notice and has fairly submitted, on instructions from Hira Singh, BDPO Sehna, District Barnala, that grievances of the petitioner, i.e. encroachment on the Government path would be vacated within two months from today.

5.

On the statement made by learned State counsel, the present petition is disposed of. Needful be done within two months from today. However, petitioner would be at liberty to avail his remedy as per law if still any cause of action accrues to him.

May 17, 2024 ( RAJESH BHARDWAJ ) meenuss JUDGE 1.

Whether speaking/reasoned ?

Yes/No 2.

Whether reportable ?

Yes/No MEENU 2024.05.20 10:10 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document