Amita Chhikara v. State Of Haryana And Another

135 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No. 12408 of 2022 Date of Decision: 01.06.2022 Amita Chhikara

...Petitioner

Versus

The State of Haryana and another

...Respondents

CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MONGA Present :

Ms. Sharmila Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Mr. Pankaj Middha, Addl. AG, Haryana.

ARUN MONGA, J. (ORAL) Petitioner herein, inter alia, seeks issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to consider her gradation certificate, already submitted by her, under the category of Outstanding Sports Person (hereinafter referred to as "OSP category") for the post of Clerk.

2.

Petitioner also submitted representation dated 26.05.2022 (Annexure P-6) requesting to consider her candidature under OSP category but the same has not been adverted till date. Hence, the petition. 3.

On advance service, learned State counsel appears and submits that a decision will be taken by competent authority, either way, on the pending representation dated 26.05.2022 (Annexure P-6). 4.

At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner also seeks decision on the pending representation, as suggested by learned State counsel.

SHALINI BHATIA 2022.06.02 10:40 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document.

CWP No. 12408 of 2022 -25.

Given the nature of order being passed, there is no necessity to seek return by any of the respondents as no further proceedings and/or pleadings are required.

6.

Without commenting on the merits of the case, the instant writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to look into the representation dated 26.05.2022 (Annexure P-6) of the petitioner and pass an administrative order, in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible.

7.

Disposed of.

JUNE 01, 2022 (ARUN MONGA) Shalini JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned :

Yes/No Whether reportable :

Yes/No SHALINI BHATIA 2022.06.02 10:40 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document.