High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/559/2015disposed of

Sarla Rani v. State Of Punjab

2015-09-04Mr Justice Rakesh Kumar Jain2 pages

Crl. Misc. No. M-559 of 2015 -1Crl. Misc. No. M-1957 of 2015 In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh 1.

Crl. Misc. No. M-559 of 2015 Date of Decision: 04.9.2015.

Sarla Rani .......Petitioner

Versus

State of Punjab ......Respondent 2.

Crl. Misc. No. M-1957 of 2015 Dheeraj Chutani .......Petitioner

Versus

State of Punjab ......Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SABINA

Present:

Mr. Amit Aggarwal, Advocate for the petitioners.

Mr. R.P.S.Sidhu, AAG, Punjab.

Mr. Puja Chopra, Advocate for the complainant.

**** SABINA, J.

Vide this order, above mentioned two petitions would be disposed of as the petitioners have sought anticipatory bail in FIR No. 159 dated 14.11.2014 under Section 406, 498-A of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, registered at Police Station Mehla, District Patiala.

This case was sent to Mediation and Conciliation Centre for making efforts regarding settlement between the parties but no settlement could be arrived between the parties. On the last date, GURPREET SINGH 2015.09.04 15:58 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document

Crl. Misc. No. M-559 of 2015 -2Crl. Misc. No. M-1957 of 2015 parties were again directed to be present in person. Today, parties are present in person.

Learned counsel for the petitioners and the counsel for the complainant have submitted that the parties have amicably settled their dispute. It has been agreed between the parties that petitioner Dheeraj Chutani will pay a sum of ` 10,00,000/- to the complainant by way of full and final settlement of her claim qua maintenance and istri dhan articles etc. Dheeraj Chutani and the complainant will file a petition under Section 13-B of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 ('Act' for short). Learned counsel have further submitted that Dheeraj Chutani will pay ` 5,00,000/- to the complainant at the time of recording of their first statements in the proceedings under Section 13-B of the Act and the remaining amount of ` 5,00,000/- would be paid to the complainant at the time of grant of decree of divorce. Learned counsel for the parties have further submitted that both the sides will withdraw the cases filed by them against each other.

Since the parties have amicably settled their dispute, interim bail granted by this Court to the petitioners, is made absolute.

Parties shall remain bound by the terms of the compromise.

Both the petitions stand disposed of accordingly. (SABINA) JUDGE September 04, 2015 Gurpreet GURPREET SINGH 2015.09.04 15:58 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document