← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/19962/2026allowed

Vikas Kumar Alias Vikas v. State Of Haryana

2026-05-12Mr. Justice Sanjay Vashisth3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH Date of Decision: 12.05.2026 VIKAS KUMAR ALIAS VIKAS

...Petitioner

Versus

STATE OF HARYANA

...Respondent

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY VASHISTH Present :

Mr. Sachin Gupta Ladwa, Advocate for the petitioner.

 



      SANJAY VASHISTH, J. (ORAL)           

   

!

" #   "

 $$%    &     '

     (  '')    &FIR No.23 dated 04.02.2026, under Sections 316(2), 318(4) of BNS and Sections 10, 24 of the Immigration Act, at Police Station Radour, District Yamunanagar.  2.

On 10.04.2026, following order was passed:

                      

  !  

"  #$%

  & & &'    (' (        (&   $))!   *  !       % +  ,)  !  -    

    ) 

     " ! " )  %  .&  



    !% )   /#   !

   !



-2-

   #$%!  "0

 

  1 !

  ) 

 2  

 !   0  ! ! !

  !) 0  1  ) % % !



!

 /      ) 

        3 "  " %   

    !

 $    1    !

 

 

) 

    "  0 !

3  

 1 !   1   

  ) 

    " 

!   

" 

      

 )



4 1 

5  7   +*89" 

    

     

 

  :     9   ) )

 "

1 *3  

( &.

&' 1 $ 

 ) 0        

 3  

  1 !   0  ;

  "

$ 1 !  ! *! "

$ 

1         )  3

    !   

    

 *  ! 4           "

    0      &      

 1      

     0    1

 



$ 1 !  !*! " 

     

  4

0 0  )    1   !



  

 " 



$      

    1 !   "  " )  !      0      ) 





< 3.

 by way of an affidavit on behalf of the respondentState has been filed in the Court today. The same is taken on record. *&

-3-  &       4.

Learned State counsel on instructions from ASI Manish Kumar submits that the petitioner has joined the investigation on 18.04.2026, and as of now, custodial interrogation of the petitioner is not required for the purpose of investigation.

5.

Since, petitioner has already joined the investigation and custodial interrogation is no more required; ad-interim bail order dated 10.04.2026 passed by this Court is hereby made absolute. Accordingly, present petition is allowed. 6.

The petitioner shall continue to join the investigation as and when required to do so and abide by all the terms and conditions laid down under Section 482(2) of BNSS, 2023.

7.

However, present order would be subject to the submission of his passport to the Investigating Agency or to Court concerned, if he possesses, within a period of one week from today. Otherwise, he would submit an affidavit, disclosing the fact that he does not possess any passport. 8.

It is clarified that in case, aforesaid condition is not complied with, this order would be considered as non est automatically. May 12, 2026 (SANJAY VASHISTH) gurpreet JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned:

Yes/No Whether reportable:

Yes/No