High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCWP/11777/2020disposed of

Taranjit Kaur v. U.T. Chandigarh And Others

2020-08-13Mr. Justice Jitendra Chauhan2 pages

CWP-11777-2020 -1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-11777-2020 (O&M) Date of decision : 13.08.2020 Taranjit Kaur

...Petitioner(s)

Versus

U.T. Chandigarh and others

...Respondent(s)

CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA CHAUHAN

Present:

Ms. Sukhpreet Kaur, Advocate for the petitioner(s). JITENDRA CHAUHAN J. (ORAL) The matter has been taken up through video-conferencing in the light of the pandemic COVID-19 situation and as per instructions. This writ petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India has been filed, inter alia, for the issuance of a direction to respondent Nos.1 and 2 for considering the Assessment Scheme sub clause (b) or (c) vide notification dated 25.06.2020 (Annexure P-3), for assessing the performance/declaration of result of the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that at this stage she would be satisfied, if a direction is issued to respondent No.2-Chairman, Central Board of Secondary Education, Shiksha Kendra, 2, Community Centre, Preet Vihar, Delhi-110092, to consider and decide the representation dated 27.07.2020 (Annexure P-9), expeditiously. ATUL SETHI 2020.08.14 14:22 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document

CWP-11777-2020 -2Heard.

Having regard to the prayer made and without adverting to the merits of the case, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2-Chairman, Central Board of Secondary Education, Shiksha Kendra, 2, Community Centre, Preet Vihar, Delhi-110092, to consider and decide the representation dated 27.07.2020 (Annexure P-9), within four weeks from the receipt of the certified copy of the judgment. In case, on consideration, the competent authority reaches to the conclusion that the benefit claimed by the petitioner is admissible to her, in such eventuality, the consequential relief be allowed, within a period of six weeks thereafter, in accordance with law. However, in case the competent authority feels that the relief claimed by the petitioner is not admissible or made out, in that case, a speaking order be passed in the matter. 13.08.2020 (JITENDRA CHAUHAN) atulsethi JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned :

Yes No Whether Reportable :

Yes No ATUL SETHI 2020.08.14 14:22 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document