Ajay Partap Singh And ANR. v. Ut Of Chandigarh And ORS.




    
    

 ! Date of decision: 31st July, 2015  Ajay Partap Singh and another Petitioners

Versus

UT of Chandigarh and others Respondents  "  #$  %
  %
 1.

Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment?

2.

Whether to be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?

Present:

None for the petitioners.

Mr. Sukant Gupta, Addl. PP, UT Chandigarh for respondent No.1.

None for respondents No.2 and 3.

 %
& $! Report dated 06.07.2015 of learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Chandigarh has been received whereby it has been mentioned that in spite of two opportunities having been afforded petitioners as well as the private respondents have failed to put in appearance and comply with the orders in making statements regarding stand of the compromise.

Even today, in spite of repeated pass5overs none has come present on behalf of the petitioners.

RATTAN PAL SINGH 2015.08.03 16:23 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court



   In view of the fact that neither anything survives in the present petition nor the petitioners appear to be interested in pursuing the matter, the petition stands dismissed for non prosecution.   %
!   '()

&


 RATTAN PAL SINGH 2015.08.03 16:23 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court