Surinder Pal Singh v. State Of Punjab And Others

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M No.25339 of 2022 Date of Decision: 17.02.2023 SURINDER PAL SINGH ...PeƟƟoner

VERSUS

STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

...Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA

Present:

Mr. Deepinder Brar, Advocate for the peƟƟoner.

Mr. Amit Shukla, AAG, Punjab.

Mr. Abhay Gupta, Advocate for respondent no.4.

**** ANOOP CHITKARA, J.

The present peƟƟon has been filed under SecƟon 482 Cr.P.C. seeking issuance of direcƟons to the respondents No.1 to 3 to stay the proceedings of second inquiry.

2. AŌer arguing for some Ɵme, counsel for the peƟƟoner submit that he shall be contended and saƟsfied if he be permiƩed to file fresh representaƟon and authority be directed to decide the same in the Ɵme bound manner. 3.

NoƟces are served upon the official respondents through the State's counsel. Given the nature of the order that this Court proposes to pass, neither the response of official respondents nor the issuance of noƟces to the private respondents is required. 4.

Let the peƟƟoner represent the concerned Commissioner of Police, within two weeks from today. If the peƟƟoner files a representaƟon with in the above-menƟoned Ɵme period of two weeks, then, the same shall be decided by the concerned Commissioner of Police, within two months, either herself or by authorizing and delegaƟng it to any officer holding IPS cadre. It is clarified that such order must be a reasoned order, and the same be communicated to the representaƟonists without delay.

5.

Liberty reserved to the peƟƟoner to file fresh peƟƟon or to take other legal remedies in accordance with the law.

NISHA 2023.02.22 16:26 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this Judicial Record/Decree/Document, which is scanned copy of the original

CRM-M No.25339 of 2022 -26.

It is clarified that there is no adjudicaƟon on merits. It is further clarified that this order shall not come in the way if the interrogaƟon of the peƟƟoner is required in any cognizable case.

7.

There would be no need for a cerƟfied copy of this order, and any Advocate for the PeƟƟoner and State can download this order and other relevant parƟculars from the official web page of this court and aƩest it to be a true copy. The concerned officer can also verify its authenƟcity and may download and use the downloaded copy for immediate use.

8.

PeƟƟon is allowed to the extent menƟoned above. All pending applicaƟons, if any, stand disposed.

(ANOOP CHITKARA) JUDGE February 17,2022 nisha-II Whether speaking/reasoned:

Yes Whether reportable:

No.

NISHA 2023.02.22 16:26 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this Judicial Record/Decree/Document, which is scanned copy of the original