Bahadur Singh Gill v. State Of Punjab

CRM-M-46777 of 2016 -1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-46777 of 2016 Date of Decision: 09.02.2017 Bahadur Singh Gill ....Petitioner

VERSUS

State of Punjab ....Respondent CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURINDER GUPTA

Present:

Mr. Surinder Gaur, Advocate for the petitioner.

Ms. Bhavna Gupta, DAG, Punjab.

******* SURINDER GUPTA, J.(Oral) The present petition has been filed under Section 438 Code of Criminal Procedure for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case FIR No. 111 dated 10.12.2016 registered for the offence punishable under Section 61 of Punjab Excise Act, 1914, at Police Station Bareta, District Mansa.

Heard.

Learned State counsel submits that the petitioner has joined the investigation and his custodial interrogation is not required. In view of submission of learned State counsel but without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this petition is allowed and order dated 29.12.2016 is made absolute till the presentation of challan, subject to the following terms:- (i) that the petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation by the police as and when required; (ii) that the petitioner shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person Jitender Kumar 2017.02.09 15:12 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CHANDIGARH

CRM-M-46777 of 2016 -2acquainted with the facts of the accusation against him so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer;

(iii) that the petitioner shall not leave India without the prior permission of the Court.

(iv) that the petitioner will seek regular bail on the presentation of challan in Court.

February 09, 2017 ( SURINDER GUPTA ) jk JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No Jitender Kumar 2017.02.09 15:12 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CHANDIGARH