Heteshbandhu v. State Of Haryana And ANR.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M No. 45924 of 2017 DATE OF DECISION :- January 17, 2018 Heteshbandhu @ Hiteshbandhu

...Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana and another

...Respondent

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S. MADAAN Present:- Mr. Aditya Sanghi, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Neeraj Poswal, AAG, Haryana.

Mr. D.K. Singal, Advocate for respondent no.2. *** Learned counsel for the complainant states that father of petitioner is pressurising the complainant to withdraw the complaint and the witnesses in the complaint not to depose against the petitioner. This is a serious matter. However, learned counsel for the petitioner states that he would ensure that nothing of that sought is done by the petitioner or his father. Let it be so done. Under such circumstances, the interim bail granted to the petitioner on 4.12.2017 is made absolute, subject to his fulfilling conditions under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.

The petition stands allowed accordingly.

(H.S. MADAAN) JUDGE January 17, 2018 p.singh Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No Parvinder Singh 2018.01.17 16:16 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh