Vipin v. State Of Haryana

CRM-M-46815-2016 -1-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH.

Crl. Misc. No.M-46815 of 2016 (O&M) Date of Decision: July 20, 2017 Vipin ......PETITIONER(s).

VERSUS

State of Haryana ....RESPONDENT(s).

CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURINDER GUPTA

Present:

Mr. S.S.Mor, Advocate for Mr. Sandeep Kotla, Adovcate for the petitioner (s).

Mr. Deepak Grewal, DAG, Haryana.

******* SURINDER GUPTA, J.(Oral) The present petition has been filed under Section 438 Code of Criminal Procedure for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case FIR No. 845 dated 19.12.2016 registered for the offence punishable under Section 506 of Indian Penal Code at Police Station Civil Line, District Hisar.

Heard.

Learned State counsel submits that the petitioner has joined the investigation and his custodial interrogation is not required for further investigation.

In view of submission of learned State counsel but without Jyoti 2017.07.20 17:31 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document HIGH COURT, CHANDIGARH

CRM-M-46815-2016 -2expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this petition is allowed and the order dated 30.12.2016 is made absolute till the presentation of challan, subject to the following terms:- (i) that the petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation by the police as and when required; (ii) that the petitioner shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the accusation against him so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer;

(iii) that the petitioner shall not leave India without the prior permission of the Court.

(iv) that the petitioner will seek regular bail on the presentation of challan in Court.

( SURINDER GUPTA ) July 20, 2017 JUDGE Jyoti-II Whether speaking/reasoned:

Yes/No Whether Reportable:

Yes/No Jyoti 2017.07.20 17:31 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document HIGH COURT, CHANDIGARH