High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/46823/2016allowed

Arindam Roy v. State Of Haryana

2018-07-17Mr. Justice Harsimran Singh Sethi2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CRM-M-46823-2016 Date of decision: 17.07.2018 Arindam Roy

...Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana

...Respondent

CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JAISHREE THAKUR

Present:

Mr. Deepak Vashishth, Advocate for the petitioner.

Ms. Gaganpreet Kaur, AAG, Haryana.

Mr. Jagjot Singh, Advocate, for Mr. Kunal Dawar, Advocate, for the complainant.

**** JAISHREE THAKUR, J. (ORAL) This is a petition that has been filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case FIR No. 264 dated 14.12.2016 under Sections 498-A, 506, 34 IPC, (Section 406 IPC has been added vide order dated 04.08.2017) registered at Police Station Women, Sector-51, Gurgaon.

Vide order dated 30.12.2016, the petitioner herein was granted ad-interim bail.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has joined the investigation.

Learned counsel for the respondent-State confirms the factum of joining investigation by the petitioner.

Satyawan 2018.07.18 17:02 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court Chandigarh

CRM-M-46823-2016 -2Since the petitioner has joined the investigation, the petition is allowed and interim order dated 30.12.2016 is hereby made absolute subject to the condition that the petitioner will not tamper with evidence or hamper the investigation; will not leave India without permission of the Court and will comply with the conditions contained in Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. 17.07.2018 (JAISHREE THAKUR) Satyawan JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes.

Whether reportable No.

Satyawan 2018.07.18 17:02 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court Chandigarh