Birla Ram And Another v. State Of Punjab And Others

CRM-M-22566-2019 --1--

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CRM-M-22566-2019 DATE OF DECISION:-23.05.2019 BIRLA RAM AND ANR.

...PETITIONERS...

V.

STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS.

...RESPONDENTS...

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMENDRA JAIN Present: Mr. Rohit Mittal, Advocate, for the petitioners.

**** RAMENDRA JAIN, J. (ORAL) Prayer in the instant petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. against in action of the respondents being beyond the scope of legal aspect as discussed through the judgment by the Apex Court in Lalita Kumari v. Govt. of UP and ors. And further to issue directions respondent No.9 to comply with the application of the petitioner attached with complaint (P-7).

Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the purpose would be achieved if respondent No.9-Station House Officer, Police Station City Malout, District Sri Muktsar Sahib is directed to look into grievances unfolded by the petitioner in his complaint dated 12.04.2019 (Annexure P-7), in a time-bound manner. Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner, instant SONIKA 2019.05.23 17:27 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh

CRM-M-22566-2019 --2-- petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.9-Station House Officer, Police Station City Malout, District Sri Muktsar Sahib, to look into the grievances unfolded by the petitioner in his complaint (Annexure P-7), and do the needful, if required. 23.05.2019 (RAMENDRA JAIN) sonika JUDGE whether speaking/reasoned:

Yes/No whether reportable:

Yes/No SONIKA 2019.05.23 17:27 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh