Ashok Kumar v. State Of Haryana

Crl. Misc. No. M-4739 of 2016 -1In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh Crl. Misc. No. M-4739 of 2016 Date of Decision: 22.8.2016 Ashok Kumar ......Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana .....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANITA CHAUDHRY

Present:

Mr. Balraj Gujjar, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Apoorv Garg, DAG, Haryana.

Mr. Ashish Naik, Advocate for the complainant.

**** ANITA CHAUDHRY, J (ORAL) Through the instant petition, the petitioner is seeking anticipatory bail in case FIR No. 5 dated 14.1.2016, registered under Sections 376(2), 506 IPC and Section 3 of SC/ST Act, Women Police Station Bhiwani.

Counsel for the petitioner states that pursuant to the order dated 10.2.2016, passed by this Court, the petitioner has joined the investigation. State counsel states that the petitioner has joined the investigation.

Looking to the circumstances, but without commenting on the merits of the case, the petition is allowed and order dated 10.2.2016 granting interim bail to the petitioner is made absolute subject to the Gurpreet Singh Bhatia 2016.08.24 09:56 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court Chandigarh

Crl. Misc. No. M-4739 of 2016 -2conditions laid down in Section 438 Sub Section 2 Clauses (i)(ii) and (iii) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

Petitioner would stay away from the victim and will not contact or communicate her in any manner and he will not tamper with the evidence.

(ANITA CHAUDHRY) JUDGE August 22, 2016 Gurpreet Whether speaking/reasoned :

Yes/No Whether reportable :

Yes/No Gurpreet Singh Bhatia 2016.08.24 09:56 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court Chandigarh