Pankaj Bagga @ Panku And ORS. v. State Of Punjab And ORS.




    
    

  Date of decision: 4th May, 2016 Pankaj Bagga @ Panku and others  Petitioners

Versus

State of Punjab and others  Respondents     !  "
  "


Present:

Mr. G.S. Jagpal, Advocate for the petitioners.

Mr. Gurveer Sidhu, Asstt. Advocate General, Punjab for respondent No.1.

None for respondents No.2 to 7.

 "
#$ !% Report dated 26.02.2016 of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ludhiana has been received whereby after recording statements of complainant Arun Gilotra and the aggrieved persons/witnesses namely Meenu Gilotra, Geeta Gilotra, Savita Grover and Kiran Grover, as well as the accused persons namely Pankaj Bagga @ Panku, Sahil Kumar, Soma Bagga, Rajesh Kumar and Lalit Bagga, the Court has shown its satisfaction that the compromise Ex.CX has been arrived at voluntarily, out of free will of the parties, without any undue influence, coercion or pressure. Heard.

In the light of the satisfaction shown by the Court, the fact that parties belong to the same very area and the offences for which RATTAN PAL SINGH 2016.05.06 15:03 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court



   the accused have been hauled up are not of serious nature, together with the fact that compromise will go a long way in ironing out differences for betterment of future life of the parties and in view of the law laid down in &'() "')*+ , "-(-.  /)0(1 ()2 ()-+.3 

 $%   $3'4')(5% 67 and &8/59')2.3 "')*+ ()2 -+.3: , "-(-.  /)0(1 ()2 ()-+.3 

 $7%   $3'4')(5%  # the prayer made in the petition is allowed, proceedings by way of FIR No.144 dated 24.06.2012 registered at Police Station Jodhewal, District Ludhiana under Sections 294/451/323/506/148/149 IPC and all consequences arising out of the said FIR qua the petitioners are quashed.

The petition stands allowed in those terms.

$  "
%   (;#

 
  RATTAN PAL SINGH 2016.05.06 15:03 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court