Harjinder Singh v. State Of Punjab
CRM-M-47161-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
CHANDIGARH CRM-M-47161-2018 Date of Decision: 30.10.2018 Harjinder Singh ... Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab ... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE INDERJIT SINGH
Present:
Mr. Ravi Malhotra, Advocate, for the petitioner.
INDERJIT SINGH, J. (Oral)
438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for brevity, 'Cr.P.C.') for grant of anticipatory bail in case FIR No.95 dated 16.09.2018, registered at Police Station Hariana, District Hoshiarpur, under Section 61 of the Punjab Excise Act, 1914.
Notice of motion was issued in this case. Learned State counsel has put in appearance on behalf of the respondent-State and contested this petition.
I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned State counsel and gone through the record. PARVEEN KUMAR 2018.10.31 16:10 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh
CRM-M-47161-2018 From the record, I find that recovery of huge quantity of countrymade liquor was effected from a truck. Co-accused, who was driver of truck was apprehended at the spot. The present petitioner is stated to have fled away from the spot.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that none of the police officials has identified the petitioner and he has been nominated only on the basis of disclosure statement of co-accused, who will not come to the witness-box to prove the identity of the petitioner. Keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the present case; without discussing the facts of the case in minute details and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I find that the petitioner is not required for custodial interrogation and no useful purpose will be served by sending him to custody. Therefore, finding merit in the present petition, the same is allowed. It is ordered that
! "# $ %
!
&'() *++
,- Note:
.
, " /0 .
/ 1 PARVEEN KUMAR 2018.10.31 16:10 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh