Rama Kant Kalia v. State Of Punjab And Another
!"#"$%&'&'( ) ) *
+ ,
%- * ' +'+' .
*' ////
Mr. Rohit Hans, DAG, Punjab.
None for respondent No.2.
'+' .
*0 '1 *2
! "#$ Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking quashing of FIR No.46 dated 06.06.2020 under Section 500 of IPC and Section 67 of Information Technology Act, 2000 registered at Police Station City Kurali, District S.A.S. Nagar alongwith all subsequent proceedings. Counsel for the petitioner has made an oral prayer to quash the order dated 20.04.2024 passed by the trial Court, whereby the cancellation report submitted by the investigating agency has been dismissed and the matter has been referred to the concerned police station for carrying out further investigation. 2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the trial Court has rejected the cancellation report submitted by the police in a mechanical manner and without considering the relevant facts and circumstances elaborated in the
cancellation report. He further submits that merely on the basis of sole statement of the complainant, the cancellation report cannot be rejected. 3.
Learned State Counsel on the other hand submits that he does not want to file reply in the present case. He further submits the investigating agency has no personal interest in the matter and that it shall be bound to obey/complying with the orders whatsoever passed by the Court.
4.
There is no representation on behalf of respondent No.2 despite service. 5.
Heard. % ! &%&'#&#()* +#, - .! . !/
- 0 ! 0 1 2
1 3! ! . 0 .! - 4
54!- - !&6&'#&#(- #&&(#&#()* +', !/ .! - 0 ! - !! . 0 0 !! !0 .. ! !- ! 0 7
/ - #&&(#&#( 0 !/ -!!4 - !0 3!.- 0
. !0 + .! - . !!-
$ 1 ! !- . .! - ! 3 !! 1 .
!"
#$ #%$ & "
/+ 8 / ! +
"
!"
#
$
%
&
' (
)
"
*
&
+#
,&- ./ 0 1 .
. -
!
"
#
$ .2
/' .
!"
#
$ .
3 6 1! . #&&(#&#( 0 ! !/ 9:1/;
! 4 .!- <& . 1'+' .
*2
&0('
4 6 7862 4 7862