Abdul Rahman @ A R Rahman & ANR v. State Of Ut Chd And ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CRM-M-46255-2017 Date of decision: - 19.02.2018 Abdul Rahman @ A.R. Rahman and another .....Petitioners

Versus

U.T. of Chandigarh and another .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MAHABIR SINGH SINDHU

Present:

None for the petitioners.

Mr. Sukant Gupta, Addl. PP, for U.T., Chandigarh. None for respondent No.2.

**** MAHABIR SINGH SINDHU , J. (ORAL) Learned counsel for respondent No.1 has pointed out that FIR No.196 dated 28.09.2017, under Sections 420 and 120-B IPC, registered at Police Station North, Chandigarh, has already been quashed on the basis of compromise, by this Court, vide order dated 01.02.2018 passed in CRM-M-48880-2017 and that was not opposed by respondent No.1-U.T., Chandigarh.

In view of above, the present petition is rendered infructuous and the same is, accordingly, stands disposed of. ( MAHABIR SINGH SINDHU) February 19, 2018 JUDGE naresh.k Whether reportable?

No Whether reasoned/speaking?

No Naresh Kumar 2018.02.20 10:18 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh