Beena v. State Of Punjab

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

CRM No.M-6232 of 2015 Date of Decision: February 25, 2015 Beena

...Petitioner

VERSUS

State of Punjab

...Respondent

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE INDERJIT SINGH

Present:

Mr.Munish Bhardwaj, Advocate for the petitioner.

**** INDERJIT SINGH, J.

Petitioner has filed this petition under Section 438 Cr.P.C. for grant of anticipatory bail in case FIR No.59 dated 08.04.2014 under Sections 376, 377 and 506 IPC and Section 4 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, registered at Police Station Maqsudan, District Jalandhar.

I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and have gone through the record.

From the record, I find that FIR in the present case has been got registered by the prosecutrix. The petitioner is mother of the prosecutrix. As per the allegations in the FIR, after the death of father of the prosecutrix, her mother had illicit relations with one Robin Masih and he regularly committed rape upon prosecutrix and when the matter was brought to the knowledge of the mother by the prosecutrix, then Robin Masih and prosecutrix's mother, gave beatings to prosecutrix and threatened her. Keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the present case, nature and gravity of the offence, I do not find it a fit case where petitioner is entitled to benefit of grant of anticipatory bail. Therefore, finding no merit in the present petition, the same is dismissed.

February 25, 2015 (INDERJIT SINGH) Vgulati JUDGE VINEET GULATI 2015.02.26 15:32 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh