Warisa v. State Of Haryana And ORS.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CRM-M-46386-2017 Date of decision: 06.12.2017 Warisa

...Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana and others

...Respondent

*****

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JAISHREE THAKUR Present:- Mr. Saleem Ahmed, Advocate, for the petitioner.

JAISHREE THAKUR, J.(ORAL) The instant petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the petitioner for issuance of a direction to the officials respondent Nos. 1 to 3 to hold investigation in FIR No. 137 dated 15.08.2017 (Annexure P-1) under Section 346 IPC, registered at Police Station Bichhor, District Nuh. In this regard she has also approached the authorities by way of representation dated 09.11.2017 (Annexure P-2).

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he would be satisfied if respondent No.2 be directed to look into the representation dated 09.11.2017 (Annexure P-2), in a time bound manner. Notice of motion.

Ms. Gaganpreet Kaur, learned AAG, Haryana who is present in the Court, accepts notice on behalf of the State. Three copies of the petition be handed over to her by learned counsel for the petitioner during the course of the day failing which no action is called for. She submits that the representation dated 09.11.2017 (Annexure P-1) will be decided within a Satyawan 2017.12.06 17:18 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court Chandigarh

CRM-M-46386-2017 -2period of two months.

Heard.

Without going into the merits of the case, the instant petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2 to decide the representation dated 09.11.2017 (Annexure P-1), within a period of two months from the date of receipt of the certified copy of this order and take necessary action in accordance with law.

06.12.2017 (JAISHREE THAKUR) Satyawan JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes Whether reportable No Satyawan 2017.12.06 17:18 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court Chandigarh