Amit v. State Of Haryana
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc. No. M-5089 of 2016 Date of decision: 17.02.2016 Amit ..Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana ..Respondent
CORAM:
HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE DAYA CHAUDHARY
1. Whether reporters of local newspapers may be allowed to see judgment? Yes/No
2. To be referred to reporters or not? Yes/No
3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Yes/No
Present:
Mr. Manjeet Singh, Advocate for the petitioner.
Ms. Trishanjali Sharma, AAG, Haryana for the respondent - State.
Daya Chaudhary, J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that during pendency of this petition, another petition was filed before the trial Court and bail has been declined. Earlier bail was declined by the trial Court on 21.11.2015.
Learned counsel for the petitioner wants to withdraw this petition at this stage.
Dismissed as withdrawn.
17.02.2016 (DAYA CHAUDHARY) neetu JUDGE NEETU RANI 2016.02.19 10:33 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh