Ravina v. Sanjay




IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH Sr. No.204 TA-710-2024 Date of Decision: 10.03.2025 

 ....Applicant

Versus

  .....Respondent

CORAM:

HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ARCHANA PURI Present:- Ms. Santosh Miglani, Advocate for Ms. Aarti Sharma, Advocate for the applicant.

None for the respondent.

***** ARCHANA PURI, J. (Oral)
 

 

    

              

   
    !"  

!      #$"% &     $ 

%  $ 

'   (   !)   * * 

   $   !  

 ) +)  "    $  !    

     ,     

 It is submitted by the counsel for the applicant that the marriage between the parties to the lis, had taken place on 04.11.2014. Two children were born from the said wedlock on 27.07.2015 and 23.02.2019 and both of them are in the care and custody of the applicant. On account of the Sonu 2025.03.10 15:38 I agree to specified portions of this document P&HHC

 
 matrimonial discord, the parties are residing separate. The applicant is solely dependent upon her parental family for the upbringing of her children. Besides the petition under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act, no other litigation is stated to be pending between the parties. In the given circumstances, it is submitted that it is difficult for the applicant, to commute a distance of about 80 kilometres, to defend the petition under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act.

In view of the aforesaid fact situation, considering the fact about the respondent having not come forward to contest the application and also considering the fact of both the children residing with the applicant, the transfer application is allowed and            

    
     !"   

!      $ #$"% &   

%  $ 

'   (  
-     !

!" #$"% &    .     / (   , .    / (          #$"% (  +)      ! #$"% (      $

$

"

 (ARCHANA PURI) 10.03.2025 JUDGE Himanshu Whether speaking/reasoned :

Yes Whether reportable :

Yes/No Sonu 2025.03.10 15:38 I agree to specified portions of this document P&HHC