Tarif And ORS v. State Of Haryana And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CRM-M No.47444 of 2018 (O&M) Date of decision: 04.09.2019 Tarif and others ....Petitioners

Versus

State of Haryana and others ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND SINGH SANGWAN

Present:

None for the petitioners.

Mr. Himmat Singh, DAG, Haryana.

ARVIND SINGH SANGWAN J. (Oral) Prayer in this petition is for quashing of FIR No.125 dated 11.06.2017 registered under Sections 379-A, 420, 395, 397 IPC and 25 of the Arms Act at Police Station Nagina, District Nuh and all other subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of the compromise.

A perusal of the office report of the last 03 dates show that the notice issued to the complainant/respondent Nos.2 and 3 have not been received back served or otherwise and in the last report, it is stated that they are not residing at the given address on the dasti notice taken by the petitioners.

In view of the above, it cannot be ascertain that there is a valid compromise between the parties, at this stage. Accordingly, this petition is disposed of having been rendered infructuous. However, liberty is granted to the petitioners to file afresh petition, if the complainant, still acknowledges the factum of compromise.

(ARVIND SINGH SANGWAN) JUDGE 04.09.2019 yakub Whether speaking/reasoned:

Yes/No Whether reportable:

Yes/No MOHD YAKUB 2019.09.04 16:35 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court, Chandigarh