Surjit Singh v. State Of Punjab

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH Sr.No.204-A CRM-M No.27860 of 2021 Date of Decision: 07.02.2022 Surjit Singh

...Petitioner

Versus

State of Punjab

...Respondent

(Heard through Video-Conferencing) CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA

Present:

Mr. Vinod K. Kaushal, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Mr. C.L. Pawar, Sr. DAG, Punjab for the respondent-State.

* * * * MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA, J.

(ORAL) The petitioner herein has sought the relief of anticipatory bail in the criminal case arising out of the FIR bearing No.65 dated 15.06.2021 registered at Police Station Mehta, District Amritsar, under Sections 420, 465, 467, 468, 471 and 120-B IPC.

Learned State counsel, on the instructions from SI Parminder Singh, from the above-said Police Station, apprises the Court that in compliance of the order dated 19.07.2021, as passed by this Court, the petitioner has joined in the investigation and his custodial interrogation is not required and he is also not involved in any other criminal case of the similar nature.

In view of the above-discussed submission as made by NEETU RANI 2022.02.07 16:36 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document PHHC

CRM-M No.27860 of 2021 -2- .....

learned State counsel, the instant petition is allowed and the relief of interim bail, as extended to the petitioner named Surjit Singh by this Court vide the said order dated 19.07.2021, is hereby made absolute. However, the petitioner shall continue to join in the investigation as and when required/called upon to do so and shall also strictly abide by all the conditions as laid down in Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. (MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA) 07.02.2022 JUDGE neetu Whether speaking/reasoned Yes Whether Reportable No NEETU RANI 2022.02.07 16:36 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document PHHC