Shingra Singh v. State Of Punjab & ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH ****** CRM-M-6387-2015 Date of Decision: 26.02.2015 Shingara Singh

...Petitioner

vs.

State of Punjab & others

...Respondents

CORAM: Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Raj Rahul Garg Present: Mr. Vivek K. Thakur, Advocate for the petitioners. ***** Raj Rahul Garg, J. (Oral) The petitioner has filed the present petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for directing the respondent Nos. 1 to 3 to take action on the representation of the petitioner dated 05.12.2014 (Annexure P-3) contending that there is a Government Primary School in village Hussainpur Dullowal, District-Kapurthala and that school falls, as per revenue record, in Khewat No. 211/202 Min/Khatauni No. 324, Khasra NO. 74/5 (1-9) and is owned by the Central Government. However, in the Jamabandi (Annexure P-1) possession has been shown as that of Education Department, Punjab.

Learned counsel for the petitioner further states that due to nonavailability of teachers the school was closed and now Anganwadi children are attending their classes in the Gurudwara of the village. Now the Sarpanch of the Gram Sabha namely Mrs. Simranjit Kaur along with her husband Mr. Anokh singh and Panch Mr. Balwinder Singh and others have demolished the building of the school and used the material of the same for MOHAMMAD WASEEM ANSARI 2015.02.

different works.

Learned counsel for the petitioner feels satisfied if direction be issued to respondent No. 2 i.e. Senior Superintendent of Police, Kapurthala for taking action on the representation of the petitioner which is Annexure P-3.

In these circumstances, respondent No. 2 i.e. Senior Superintendent of Police, Kapurthala is directed to take appropriate action in accordance with law on the representation dated 05.12.2014 (Annexure P-3).

Petition stands disposed of, accordingly.

(Raj Rahul Garg) Judge 26.02.2015 waseem MOHAMMAD WASEEM ANSARI 2015.02.27 11:07 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh