Mursaleen @ Musi v. State Of Haryana

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CRM No.M-23344 of 2019 Date of Decision: May 24, 2019 Mursaleen alias Musi

...Petitioner

VERSUS

State of Haryana

...Respondent

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE INDERJIT SINGH

Present:

Mr.Nafish Ahmed, Advocate for the petitioner.

**** INDERJIT SINGH, J.

Petitioner has filed this petition under Section 439 Cr.P.C. for grant of regular bail in case FIR No.969 dated 21.12.2018 under Sections 307, 427 IPC, Section 25 of the Arms Act and Section 13(1) of H.G.S.G. Act, 2015, registered at Police Station Sector-7, Faridabad. Notice of motion.

Mr.Sharad Kumar Yadav, DAG, Haryana, has put in appearance on behalf of the respondent-State and contested the petition. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned State counsel and have gone through the record. The perusal of the record shows that it is a no injury case. The petitioner has been in custody since 21.12.2018. He is not required for any investigation or interrogation purposes as he is in judicial VINEET GULATI 2019.05.24 16:07 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh custody. The trial of the case will take long time. No useful purpose will be

CRM No.M-23344 of 2019 -2served by keeping the petitioner in custody till the disposal of the case. Keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the present case, without discussing the facts in minute detail and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the present petition is allowed and the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail subject to his furnishing personal/surety bonds in the sum of `50,000/- with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court/Duty Magistrate. May 24, 2019 (INDERJIT SINGH) Vgulati JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes Whether reportable No VINEET GULATI 2019.05.24 16:07 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh