Ashfak v. State Of Haryana

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH -.- CRM-M-22573-2025 (O&M) Date of Decision: 29.04.2025 Ashfak ......Petitioner Vs.

State of Haryana ......Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUDEEPTI SHARMA

Present:

Mr. Afjal Hussain, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Vikram Singh, Assistant Advocate General, Haryana ---- SUDEEPTI SHARMA.J. (ORAL) 1.

Present petition has been filed for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in FIR No.129, dated 01.04.2025, registered under Sections 20 of Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, at Police Station City Palwal, District Palwal (Haryana).

2.

Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case and prays for grant of bail to the petitioner.

3.

Upon advance notice, learned State counsel appears and contends that the bail application filed by the petitioner has been dismissed by the learned Addl. Sessions Judge, Palwal, after taking into consideration the antecedents of the petitioner. He further contends that the petitioner is also involved in four other cases of same nature i.e. FIR No. 257, dated 17.06.2020 under Sections 20, 61, 85 of the NDPS Act, FIR No.362/2022, TRIPTI SAINI 2025.05.02 14:08 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CRM-M-22573-2025 (O&M) -2- under Sections 20, 61, 85 of the NDPS Act and FIR No.366/2009, under Sections 148,149, 323, 452,506 and 379 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. 4.

Keeping in view the criminal background of the petitioner, no ground is made to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. The present petition is, accordingly, dismissed.

5.

Pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. April 29, 2025 (SUDEEPTI SHARMA) tripti JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned:

Speaking Whether reportable:

Yes / No TRIPTI SAINI 2025.05.02 14:08 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document