Halima And ANR v. State Of Punjab And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH ****** CRM-M-6502-2015 Date of Decision: 26.02.2015 Halima and another

...Petitioners

vs.

State of Punjab & others

...Respondents

CORAM: Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Raj Rahul Garg Present: Mohd. Yousaf , Advocate for the petitioners. ***** Raj Rahul Garg, J. (Oral) This petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for issuance of directions to respondent No. 3 not to harass the petitioners i.e. newly married couple and not to harass or interfere in the peaceful married life of the petitioners and seeking protection as the petitioners are apprehending danger to their life and personal liberty at the hands of respondent Nos. 4 to 7.

Learned counsel for the petitioners states that the petitioners will be satisfied if respondent No. 2 i.e. Senior Superintendent of Police, Barnala is directed to take appropriate action in accordance with law on the application (Annexure P-5) made to him by the petitioners. In view of the limited prayer made by the learned counsel for the petitioners and without going into the merits of the claim raised by the petitioners, this petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No. 2 i.e. SSP, Barnala to take appropriate action in accordance with law on MOHAMMAD WASEEM ANSARI 2015.02.26 18:00 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh

application dated 18.02.2015 (Annexure P-5) already stated to have been moved to him by the petitioners.

Nothing in this order shall have any bearing regarding age of the petitioners or validity of their marriage or any civil or criminal proceeding. (Raj Rahul Garg) Judge 26.02.2015 waseem MOHAMMAD WASEEM ANSARI 2015.02.26 18:00 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh