Rajni Devi v. State Of Haryana

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CRM No.M-46681 of 2017 (O&M) Date of Decision: December 07, 2017 Rajni Devi

...Petitioner

VERSUS

State of Haryana

...Respondent

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE INDERJIT SINGH

Present:

Mr.P.S.Sullar, Advocate for the petitioner.

**** INDERJIT SINGH, J.

Petitioner has filed this petition under Section 438 Cr.P.C. for grant of anticipatory bail in case FIR No.217 dated 13.09.2016 under Section 409 IPC, registered at Police Station Naraingarh, District Ambala. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and have gone through the record.

From the record, I find that as per the allegations in the FIR, the present petitioner has embezzled an amount of `31,63,803/- of the Gram Panchayat when she was Sarpanch of the village Budhakhera. Keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the present case, nature and gravity of the offence, without discussing the facts in minute detail and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I find that petitioner is required for custodial interrogation. No ground is Vineet Gulati 2017.12.08 14:21 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh

CRM No.M-46681 of 2017 -2made out for granting benefit of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Therefore, finding no merit in the present petition, the same is dismissed.

December 07, 2017 (INDERJIT SINGH) Vgulati JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes Whether reportable No Vineet Gulati 2017.12.08 14:21 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh