Akhil Bhartiya Shivsena Rashtravadi v. Election Commssion Of India And Others
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
CHANDIGARH CWP-11512-2026 (O&M) Decided on :18.04.2026 AKHIL BHARATIYA SHIVSENA RASHTRAVADI
...Petitioner
Versus
ELECTION COMMISSION OF INDIA AND OTHERS ```
...Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK MANCHANDA PRESENT: Mr. Anil Bansal, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Anmol Rai Garg, Advocate for Mr. Prateek Gupta, Advocate for the respondent-ECI. **** HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI , J. (Oral) 1.
In the present petition, the prayer of the petitioner is for issuance of direction to the respondents to decide the appeal dated 02.10.2025 (Annexure P-5) filed against the order dated 19.09.2025 (Annexure P-4), whereby the petitioner has been ordered to be delisted from the register of the respondent No. 1, wherein it has been registered as Registered Unrecognized Political Party (RUPP). 2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner filed an appeal dated 02.10.2025 (Annexure P-5) against the order dated 19.09.2025 (Annexure P-4) before the appellate authority but the same is still pending consideration with the appellate authority and the appellant (petitioner herein) will be satisfied, at this stage, in case a direction is issued to the appellate authority to decide the same in a time bound manner by passing an appropriate speaking order.
3.
Notice of motion.
4.
On the asking of the Court, Mr. Anmol Rai Garg, who is RIYA 2026.04.18 15:14 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CWP-11512-2026 (O&M) present in Court, accepts notice on behalf of the respondent No. 1 and submits that in case, any appeal dated 02.10.2025 (Annexure P-5) against the order dated 19.09.2025 (Annexure P-4) has been received in the office of the concerned authorities and the same are still pending consideration with the authorities concerned, the same will be decided by the competent authority within a period of two months of the receipt of certified copy of this order by passing an appropriate speaking order in accordance with law and by giving due opportunity of hearing to all the parties concerned. 5.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that keeping in view the statement of learned State counsel, the present appeal may kindly be disposed of having been not pressed any further. 6.
Ordered accordingly 7.
Pending civil miscellaneous application(s), if any, stand disposed of.
(HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI) JUDGE ( DEEPAK MANCHANDA ) JUDGE 18.04.2026 Riya Whether speaking/reasoned:
Yes/No Whether Reportable: Yes/No RIYA 2026.04.18 15:14 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document